Posterior-Stabilized Antibiotic Cement Articulating Spacer With Endoskeleton-Reinforced Cam Reduces Rate of Post-Cam Mechanical Complications in Prosthetic Knee Infection: A Preliminary Study

BackgroundPosterior-stabilized antibiotic cement articulating spacers (PS spacers) reduce spacer mechanical complications in prosthetic knee infections (PKIs); however, joint dislocation after femoral cam fracture has been reported. We hypothesized that the rate of post-cam mechanical complications is lower in PS spacers with an endoskeleton-reinforced cam.MethodA retrospective study of PKIs using PS spacers with or without a Kirschner wire–reinforced cam (K-PS or nK-PS spacers, respectively) was conducted between 2015 and 2019. The rates of post-cam mechanical complications and reoperation, as well as risk factors for post or cam failure, were analyzed.ResultsThe cohort included 118 nK-PS and 49 K-PS spacers. All patients were followed up for 2 years. The rate of joint subluxation/dislocation after femoral cam fracture was lower in K-PS (0%) than in nK-PS spacers (17.8%; P = .002). The reoperation rate for spacer mechanical complications was lower in K-PS (0%) than in nK-PS spacers (11.9%; P = .008). The identified risk factors for femoral cam fractures were body mass index ≥25 kg/m², femoral spacer size ≤2, and surgical volume ≤12 resection arthroplasties per year.ConclusionThis preliminary study highlights that K-PS spacers have a lower rate of post-cam mechanical complications than nK-PS spacers. We recommend the use of PS spacers with endoskeleton-reinforced cam when treating PKIs performed by surgeons with lower surgical volumes, especially in patients with higher body mass index and smaller femoral spacer sizes.     

Use of Autologous Costal Cartilage Combined with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene in Asian Rhinoplasty

BackgroundThe corresponding author's experience and recent methods employed in autologous costal cartilage grafts combined with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) in Asian rhinoplasty were presented in this study.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of rhinoplasty performed on patients using autogenous costal cartilage grafts combined with an ePTFE implant.MethodsSeventy-five rhinoplasty cases with autologous costal cartilage grafts and an ePTFE implant were retrospectively reviewed. Graft types, complications associated with the graft itself or graft harvesting, surgical outcomes, and patient satisfaction were assessed.ResultsThe mean follow-up time post-operation was 13.5 months. A total of 42/75 patients underwent revision surgeries. Graft-related complications were found in 8% of cases, including two warped graft and four infection cases. Three individuals with infections had mild graft resorption. One patient with an infection removed the implant. Graft exposure, mobility, and substantial resorption were not recorded. A total of two cases underwent revision procedures for infection and perforation, respectively. Chest incision lengths for graft harvesting averaged 2.1 cm. No pneumothorax or significant donor-site pain was found. Donor-site scars were negligible, although two cases had hypertrophic chest scars. In general, functional and esthetic outcomes were mostly satisfactory among the assessed patients.ConclusionsRhinoplasty using autologous rib cartilage provides adequate support and sufficient cartilage amounts for correcting nasal contouring. Meanwhile, ePTFE alone for nasal dorsum augmentation safely achieves satisfactory outcomes. Rib cartilage rhinoplasty performed by an experienced surgeon yields excellent, long-lasting results with minimal risk; however, the potential for infection should be considered following revision surgery.     

感音神经性聋患儿伴分泌性中耳炎同期人工耳蜗植入效果分析

目的探讨伴分泌性中耳炎的感音神经性聋患儿同期植入人工耳蜗术后的听觉言语康复效果。方法回顾性分析安徽医科大学第一附属医院2015年1月到2017年12月期间伴分泌性中耳炎同期植入人工耳蜗的感音神经性聋患儿30例(A组)的临床资料,并与同期不伴分泌性中耳炎的感音神经性聋患儿30例(B组)比较。所有患儿均采用面隐窝入路植入人工耳蜗,术后随访24个月,采用听觉行为分级(categories of auditory performauce-Ⅱ,CAP-Ⅱ)和言语可懂度分级(speech intelligibility rating,SIR)评估并比较两组患儿的听觉言语康复效果。结果 A组患儿同期植入人工耳蜗后均未出现术后并发症,术前A组CAP-II评分为0.87±1.07分,SIR评分为1.07±0.37分,术后分别为5.07±0.91和3.73±0.87分,术后较术前明显提高(P<0.01)。B组术前CAP-II评分为0.93±1.17分,SIR评分为1.10±0.40分,术后分别为5.23±0.77和3.77±0.73分,术后较术前明显提高(P<0.01)。A组与B组之间术前、术后CAP-II和SIR评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论感音神经聋患儿伴分泌性中耳炎患儿同期人工耳蜗植入安全可行,且分泌性中耳炎对术后听觉言语康复效果无明显影响。     

Genetic testing has the potential to impact hearing preservation following cochlear implantation

Abstract

Background: Recent advances in less-invasive surgery and electrode design allow for a high degree of hearing preservation (HP) after cochlear implantation (CI), although residual hearing still deteriorates in some patients. To date, the factors predictive of preserving residual hearing remain a controversial topic.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive factors, including the etiology of hearing loss (HL) as a patient-related factor, influencing residual HP after CI.

Methods: Forty-four patients (50 ears, 41 families) with residual acoustic hearing who underwent CI were included. Auditory thresholds before and at 6 months after initial activation were measured. Genetic testing was performed to identify the responsible genes for HL.

Results: We identified the cause of HL in 21 families (51.2%). HP was marginally correlated with age at implantation, while it was independent of pre-operative low-frequency hearing thresholds, cochlear duct length, and electrode length. We found that patients who had pathogenic variants in the CDH23, MYO7A, or MYO15A gene showed statistically better HP scores compared with patients with HL due to other causes (p?=?.002).

Conclusions: Identification of the etiology of HL using genetic testing is likely to facilitate the prediction of HP after implant surgery.     

建立下肢形态学数据库为匹配术后即装假肢提供参考

文题释义： 术后假肢：现代截肢康复的方法包括手术后安装临时假体，即在完成截肢手术后，医生为患者佩戴合适的临时假体。 大腿影像数据：研究采集的大腿数据包括膝上缘周径、膝上缘5 cm处周径、膝上缘10 cm处周径和膝上缘15 cm处周径，将大腿MRI数据导入3D重建软件，得到大腿截肢范围段表面积、体积。 大腿截肢范围段：为膝关节间隙上10-25 cm。 背景：目前假肢的制作是通过取型、修型、成型3个步骤完成的，由于修型过程是人工完成，与临床技师的经验技术密切相关，制作出来的假肢不美观，接受腔与残肢很难做到全接触。 目的：收集健康志愿者大腿MRI影像数据，评估成人大腿截肢范围段(膝关节间隙上10-25 cm)的对称性；将MRI影像数据建立成数据库，为下肢截肢患者匹配合适的术后即装假肢提供参考数据。 方法：招募40名健康志愿者，采集基本信息：年龄、身高、体质量、膝上缘周径、膝上缘5 cm处周径、膝上缘10 cm处周径和膝上缘15 cm处周径。所有志愿者对试验方案均知情同意，且得到医院伦理委员会批准。对大腿截肢范围进行三维重建，以模型的表面积、体积为参数，对每一例志愿者大腿进行解剖测量，利用三维逆向工程软件对测量结果进行3D偏差分析，完成大腿形态对称性的定量化和可视化分析。 结果与结论：①同体分析：同一个体左右大腿截肢范围段表面积之间的最大百分差异比不超过0.56%(P=0.109)；左右大腿截肢范围段体积之间最大百分差异比不超过1.19%(P=0.182)；三维偏差分析结果显示，最大平均负偏差为-1.47 mm，最大平均正偏差为1.14 mm。40例受试者的3D偏差分布78.02%在2 mm以内，20.97%在2.1-3.0 mm，仅1.01%大于3 mm。②异体分析：三维偏差分析结果显示，最大平均负偏差为-1.97 mm，而最大平均正偏差为1.89 mm。③提示成人双侧大腿截肢范围具有高度的解剖学对称性；当2名成人的膝上缘周径、膝上缘5 cm处周径、膝上缘10 cm周径和膝上缘15 cm处周径分别都相差在2 cm以内时，则认为这2名成人双侧大腿截肢范围段表面轮廓具有高度相似性，与性别、身高和体质量无关。 ORCID: 0000-0001-6838-3042(伍笑棋) 中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：人工关节；骨植入物；脊柱；骨折；内固定；数字化骨科；组织工程     

Apical U-shape splitting technique for undercut areas of the anterior alveolar ridge: a prospective non-randomized controlled study

The aim of this study was to investigate a novel apical U-shape splitting technique for horizontal bone augmentation in undercut areas and to compare its efficacy with that of guided bone regeneration (GBR). This was a prospective non-randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 36 patients, who presented with a labial undercut that was not able to house a normally inclined implant, underwent the new technique or GBR. Radiographic and clinical data were obtained preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and 12 months after surgery. Pairwise comparisons of changes in ridge width gain, marginal bone loss, and pink aesthetic score were performed; correlations with pristine ridge morphology were investigated. The results showed similar marginal bone loss in the two groups. The overall ridge width gains in the new technique group (2.56 ± 1.92 mm) and GBR group (0.73 ± 1.21 mm) differed significantly (P < 0.05). The pink aesthetic score was higher for the new technique group (11.75 ± 1.22) than for the GBR group (9.25 ± 1.86) (P < 0.01). The morphology of the concavity had different impacts on regeneration in the two groups. The apical U-shape splitting technique, as a safe and effective alternative to GBR, provided a significant increase in bone volume gain where labial fenestration was inevitable during implant placement.